|
The
Paradoxes of Project Leadership
By Bob McGannon
The way to success
as a leader is to be perceived as consistent and supportive. Sometimes
the way to achieve that perception is to be constantly caring, occasionally
inconsistent and selectively supportive.
The opening paragraph seems paradoxical, doesn't it? How can one
be perceived as consistent, while being inconsistent? Even more far
fetched, how can one be perceived as supportive, without being supportive?
Before you abandon these thoughts as being absurd, consider this;
aren't we as humans often paradoxical? Anyone who has raised a child
understands that at times the best way to be supportive is to say "no".
Elevating your consciousness about the contradictions that people
bring to you, and being flexible in handling situations at work will
genuinely improve your perception as a leader. Here are a few points
to consider:
The Best Way to be Nice is Not to be Nice
"If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" or "That
is not a nice thing to say" have echoed through the ears of every
child that wasn't raised as Tarzan was, by a family of chimps. Although
serving its limited purpose at the time, that approach to relationships
and the workplace isn't very productive. Yet many people hold on
to the adage, and the behavior it inspired. We all need people who
will politely and discreetly tell us that part of the salad you had
for lunch is hanging off one of our front teeth, or that the fastener
that holds the upper part of our pants together is undone! Those
that avoid sharing this info with us for the sake of being nice aren't
being supportive.
More significantly, however, are the people who see you doing something
that they don't agree with, or don't feel it is in your overall best
interest, that decline to discuss it with you. As a friend, relative,
co-worker or manager you have a different perspective as to who people
are and how they react to things. In addition, you can bring a different
set of experiences and lessons learned.
Can you think of an instance where you did not follow your gut instincts,
only to make a mistake and to later hear from a colleague or a project
team member that they thought you were doing the wrong thing, but
thought they would be considered "meddling" if they discussed it
with you?
continue>>
|